Author Topic: QE2's 1992 Martha's Vineyard Grounding  (Read 38838 times)

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

Online Rob Lightbody

  • Administrator
  • Queens Grill Diner
  • *****
  • Posts: 12352
  • Total likes: 15895
  • Helping to Keep The Legend Alive
    • Rob Lightbody dot com
Re: 1992 Martha's Vineyard Grounding
« Reply #45 on: Oct 09, 2016, 12:33 PM »
Been ferreting around. Here's a nice link telling how they ever so carefully looked after her - to get her in dock    http://www.csmonitor.com/1992/0814/14032.html

Fantastic, I'd never read that before, thanks.
Passionate about QE2's service life for 40 years and creator of this website.  I have worked in IT for 28 years and created my personal QE2 website in 1994.

Offline Louis De Sousa

  • QE2 Crew member
  • Queens Grill Diner
  • *****
  • Posts: 3842
  • Total likes: 3844
  • QE2 The Greatest Ship Ever
Re: 1992 Martha's Vineyard Grounding
« Reply #46 on: Feb 16, 2017, 09:07 PM »
A few photos from the damage thanks to Jon Edmonds

Offline cunardqueen

Re: 1992 Martha's Vineyard Grounding
« Reply #47 on: Mar 13, 2017, 02:38 PM »
The Newspaper reports The Boston Herald
From the moment you first glimpsed the Queen,
 you just knew you were in for a very special time ahead.!

Online Rob Lightbody

  • Administrator
  • Queens Grill Diner
  • *****
  • Posts: 12352
  • Total likes: 15895
  • Helping to Keep The Legend Alive
    • Rob Lightbody dot com
Re: 1992 Martha's Vineyard Grounding
« Reply #48 on: Mar 21, 2018, 03:21 PM »
Short clip here of coverage of her arriving home in Southampton afterwards.

https://www.gettyimages.co.uk/license/815084250

https://www.gettyimages.co.uk/license/815082072
Passionate about QE2's service life for 40 years and creator of this website.  I have worked in IT for 28 years and created my personal QE2 website in 1994.

Online Lynda Bradford

Re: QE2's 1992 Martha's Vineyard Grounding
« Reply #49 on: Mar 21, 2018, 04:19 PM »
An elegant QE2 gliding into port.

Also enjoyed reading once again the report about the ship undergoing repairs in Boston.  There is so much information about QE2 on the forum - an amazing resource. 

 
Been ferreting around. Here's a nice link telling how they ever so carefully looked after her - to get her in dock    http://www.csmonitor.com/1992/0814/14032.html
I was proud to be involved with planning QE2's 50 year conference in September 2017 in Clydebank

Offline Howie

QE2 on the rocks, parts of prop blades
« Reply #50 on: Aug 16, 2018, 10:55 AM »
On August 7th 1992 the QE2 struck an obstruction while travelling at 24 knots, after the blades were removed in dry dock parts of the blades were chopped up to see what caused them to tear apart. I have a couple of pieces of these blades, they were given to me by the Technical stores manager at the time as paper weights.... one piece has numbers stamped on it ...2543-7-6 .... just thought i would post one of my more unusual artifacts...whats yours?

Offline Bruce Nicholls

Re: QE2 on the rocks, parts of prop blades
« Reply #51 on: Aug 17, 2018, 09:55 AM »
What is the round part with the numbers and what is it made of? It looks very like a bolt on zinc anode to me.

Interesting souvenirs.

Offline Howie

Re: QE2 on the rocks, parts of prop blades
« Reply #52 on: Aug 17, 2018, 11:45 AM »
havent a clue, i always assumed it was from part of the prop, i do not thin it is zinc , looks like phosphor bronze alloy...

Online Thomas Hypher

  • Queens Grill Diner
  • *****
  • Posts: 2879
  • Total likes: 5604
  • QE2 started a dream to go to sea - now a reality!
Re: QE2 on the rocks, parts of prop blades
« Reply #53 on: Aug 17, 2018, 04:03 PM »
Did QE2 have to have a replacement set of propellers fitted or were they repaired given the severe sounding damage to them? If so the July 1988 date for distance travelled in the other topic could be wrong?
First sailed on QE2 in August 2003 aged 6 years old. Last sailed on QE2 in July 2008. Last saw the seagoing QE2 in person from the decks of QM2, on QE2's last Transatlantic crossing (Eastbound tandem) in October 2008. Visited QE2 in her new life, in Dubai, in January 2020 and August 2022.

Online Michael Gallagher

Re: QE2 on the rocks, parts of prop blades
« Reply #54 on: Aug 17, 2018, 05:16 PM »
I don't think the propellers were damaged at all.

Damage was largely confined to the forward half of the vessel and was concentrated in the areas of the keel and associated bottom plating. Ingress of water to the vessel was contained within deep and double-bottom tanks and caused no adverse effect on stability.

The Damage

•   A sounding pipe for No 1 Saltwater Double-Bottom Ballast Tank was found to be fractured within the Forward Tunnel space of the Engine Room and water was gushing into the forward Tunnel space. A tapered, damage control wooden plug was forced into the pipe to arrest the flow before the floodwater in the tank could be pumped out.

•   The previously empty No 10 fuel oil overflow tank in the double bottom had also filled and an officer was sent aft to see whether any traces of residue oil were contaminating the ship’s wake. The discovered seepage was reported to the US Coast Guard when a further report was made, the initial report being made 40 minutes after the grounding.

•   No 15 freshwater double-bottom tank, which had previously been empty, was full of saltwater and pressurised.

•   A cofferdam (between Nos 13, 14 and 15 freshwater double bottom tanks – the latter two later found to be contaminated with seawater – and Nos 8, 9 and 10 fuel oil tanks) was also found to be full.

•   No 14 freshwater double-bottom tank was not pressurised and contained seawater.

•   The tank top at the bottom of No 3 Hold was discovered to be buckled, possibly from the pressure of the air being compressed by the ingress of water and a damage control team was sent to wedge sturdy wooden shoring between the deck and deckhead in an attempt to prevent any likelihood of the tank-top rupturing under the tremendous pressure with a subsequent flooding of the compartment above.

•   The Forward Engine Room void space was making water.

The degree of damage to the shell plating ranged from an intermittent longitudinal rupture in way of the keel strake to general plate indentation and surface scaring.

Internal damage was sustained to associated frames and longitudinals located below the level of the double-bottom tank top.

It was only after QE2 had been placed in the dry dock that the true extent of the damage to the underwater hull became known. In all the damage covered a width of 80 feet over the keel and either side of it and extended over a length of 400 feet aft from the bulbous bow. The keel was covered in indents – some up to 240 feet in length and 14 inches deep – gouges and fractures, some of the latter being from 10 to 70 feet long and a 32 foot length and plates were buckled in place. In total 20 double-bottom tanks had sustained damaged to some extent and the port bilge keel had been severely damaged.

Offline Twynkle

Re: QE2 on the rocks, parts of prop blades
« Reply #55 on: Aug 18, 2018, 01:40 PM »
This is a really interesting account regarding the grounding - thank you, Michael.

(Mods - there is more on the topic here too)
https://www.theqe2story.com/forum/index.php?topic=217.msg2134#msg2134

Offline June Ingram

  • Global Moderator
  • Queens Grill Diner
  • *****
  • Posts: 9582
  • Total likes: 6516
  • Beautiful, elegant QE2 - forever Queen of the Seas
Re: QE2 on the rocks, parts of prop blades
« Reply #56 on: Aug 19, 2018, 03:25 AM »
Thank you very much, Michael, for this detailed information. There was indeed a lot of damage done.
QE2 - the ship for all of time, a ship of timeless beauty !

Offline skilly56

Re: QE2 on the rocks, parts of prop blades
« Reply #57 on: Aug 19, 2018, 09:38 PM »
To enable propeller blades to be disassembled from the hub they usually have a hole in the blade surface for the lifting bracket to be bolted through. The circular piece in the photo looks like it could be one half of the bolt-in plug that fills the lifting hole in the blade surface.

Checking into the old Queen Mary tomorrow in Long Beach. She probably doesn't smoke like the current one! 8)

Skilly

Offline Howie

Re: QE2 on the rocks, parts of prop blades
« Reply #58 on: Aug 21, 2018, 09:35 AM »
no damage to prop blades?  I remember  that we had a spare set of blades at the warehouse & the frames that the blades were housed in had to be un welded as there was always a worry of the blades being stolen so the frames were welded together, then these blades were air freighted to the USA if I can recall correctly or somewhere ?. Cunard always were good up covering up the whole story, just like when the helicopter crashed in to top deck after it was delivering newspapers to the ship & had to be craned of in Southampton...
maybe I am wrong & it might of been another occurrence, but one thing I am sure of these were off the QE2 & were damaged in an accident.

Offline pete cain

Re: QE2's 1992 Martha's Vineyard Grounding
« Reply #59 on: Feb 04, 2019, 03:58 PM »
https://owlcation.com/humanities/QE2
  midway down this article interesting  photo of QE2 I've never seen before with oil boom surrounding. havn't read any of it yet, so cannot comment.