Author Topic: QE2's Hull Patches - what was each one from?  (Read 7796 times)

0 Members and 10 Guests are viewing this topic.

Online Michael Gallagher

Re: Hull Patches - what was each one from?
« Reply #15 on: Nov 14, 2017, 07:10 AM »
Grounding - 1992

Having spent the day of 7 August off the north east tip of the island of Martha’s Vineyard QE2 weighed anchor just after 2030 hours and headed south-west. On the Bridge were Captain Robin Woodall, the Staff Captain, the First Officer, two deck ratings and an experienced US pilot, Captain John F Hadley. It had been assumed by the Pilot that he would follow the same route to exit the Sound as he had used when he took the ship in earlier that day - but he changed his mind.

There was much small boat traffic around QE2 and ferries were frequently travelling between Oak Bluffs, Vineyard Haven and Woods Hole. Later the density of the traffic had reduced so at 2120 hours the speed was gradually increased to approximately 25 knots from 17 knots.

After making a projected plot from the course required the Second Officer realised that the ship would be sailing over the Sow and Pigs Reef that extended out from Cuttyhunk Island. The Captain was advised of this and he discussed the situation with the Pilot. The Pilot agreed and QE2 was turned to the southwest.

At 2158 hours QE2 had reached a point approximately 3.5 miles SSW of Cuttyhunk Island and was about to pass over the southern tip of the shoaling seabed as she prepared to skirt the main areas of the reefs when she experienced two periods of heavy vibration in quick succession.

The engines began to slow and QE2 began to lose speed. Captain Woodall contacted the Staff Chief Engineer in the Engine Control Room who reported that the propeller shafts were still turning at 144 rpm and that he was instructing his staff to check for possible damage. Thus mechanical breakdown was quickly ruled out and the First Officer confirmed that QE2 had not been involved in a collision with another vessel.

Captain Woodall:

“My first thought was that this was a catastrophic machinery failure; an engine broken loose or a propeller had come off!”

The Second Officer reported to the Captain that QE2 was in an area where the chart indicated a sounding of six and a half fathoms (39 feet). Other personnel, including the Chief Officer and the Senior First Officer arrived on the Bridge. The Pilot checked the charted position of the vessel with his own observation of the after radar display.

The Pilot and Captain soon concurred that QE2 had probably passed through an area where the water was not as deep as the charts indicated.

The Chief Officer was instructed to undertake internal soundings in order to determine the extent of the damage. Hold spaces, dry tanks and void spaces and the tanks were all checked, and it was soon ascertained that there was water in what should have been empty ballast and oil overflow tanks.

The Captain made a general announcement throughout the ship to the effect that QE2 had appeared to have struck an underwater object but that she was quite safe and the matter was being investigated. AT 2236 hours the Pilot reported the incident to the United States Coast Guard at Point Judith.

Further damage assessments concluded that the No 15 Freshwater Double-Bottom Tank, which had previously been slack, was now full and pressurised; a cofferdam located between NO 13, 14 and 15 Freshwater Double-Bottom Tanks and No 8, 9 and 10 Fuel Oil Double-Bottom Tanks, were also found to be full and some buckling was found in the tank top of no 3 Hold.

A possible sighting of oil in the water around the liner was reported to the Captain and, at 2252 hours, the Pilot informed the USCG of this. AT 2255 hours, the vessel was instructed to anchor and wait for the arrival of the USCG boarding party.

There was no panic among the passengers and the evening entertainment continued as scheduled with many passengers taking advantage of free drinks now being offered in the bars.

At 2232 hours QE2 was anchored in a position with Buzzards Lighthouse and shortly afterwards Lifeboat 11 was lowered to the water to search for signs of oil pollution. The Chief Officer reported a light sheen on the water surface in the area below the port bridge wing and he also reported the draughts of the vessel which were noted to equate to those calculated by the Stability Officer; no visible damage was reported.

At 2400 hours ballast pumping operations from No1 Saltwater Double-Bottom Ballast Tank were terminated. At the same time No 14 Freshwater Double-Bottom Tank was found to be pressurised and the contents of No 14 and No 15 Freshwater Double-Bottom Tanks were sampled and found to contain saltwater.

At 0215 hours Coast Guard vessel Bittersweet arrived on site and Coastguards boarded QE2.

The Forward Engine Room Void Space was found to be taking in water.

QE2 was carrying 923,454 gallons of oil fuel, of which there was a danger of about 40,000 gallons leaking, so the Coastguards ordered an oil containment boom to be placed from amidships on one side of the QE2, around her stern to amidships on the other side and this was in place by 0650 hours.

In accordance with regulations a nurse boarded QE2 in order to perform drug and alcohol tests on the Captain, First Officer and Pilot. These tests would later report that only low levels of caffeine had been found.

From 0700 to 0725 hours floodwater from the Forward Engine Room Void Space was pumped directly overboard under USCG observation followed by water being pumped overboard from NO 12 Saltwater Double-Bottom Tank.

In order to assess the extent of hull damage divers were sent down.

It had been decided that the passengers would have to be disembarked. At 1405 hours the passenger launch Schamonchi arrived alongside. Initially 555 passengers were taken ashore at 1500 hours.

At 1730 hours permission was granted for QE2 to proceed towards Newport where she anchored at 2006 hours. This would make disembarking the remainder of the passengers easier and that operation was commenced again at 2040 hours using the ship’s own lifeboats and two shore tenders, Viking Queen and Spirit of Newport. The disembarkation of all passengers was complete by 0220 hours on 9 August.

Passengers were then taken by train and bus to their intended destination, New York.

In the event only 30 gallons of fuel leaked from QE2 so the oil protection boom was removed.

QE2 then proceeded, accompanied by a Coast Guard cutter and two tugs, to Boston at around eight knots. She arrived there after a nine and a half hour journey to be dry docked for survey and, as they turned out to be, temporary repairs. QE2 was drydocked at the General Ship Corporation and the previously surveyed damage to her hull was confirmed once the dock was pumped dry.

It was only after QE2 had been placed in the dry dock that the true extent of the damage to the underwater hull became known. In all the damage covered a width of 80 feet over the keel and either side of it and extended over a length of 400 feet aft from the bulbous bow. The keel was covered in indents – some up to 240 feet in length and 14 inches deep – gouges and fractures, some of the latter being from 10 to 70 feet long and a 32 foot length and plates were buckled in place. In total 20 double-bottom tanks had sustained damaged to some extent and the port bilge keel had been severely damaged.

It soon became clear that full repairs would not be able to be carried out in Boston as the yard did not have the staff, the resources or the correct grade of steel to complete the job. After initial repairs QE2 would have to proceed elsewhere for final repairs. The Hamburg shipyard of Blohm & Voss was successful in their bid and QE2 left Boston on 1 September and headed for Germany. On arrival in Hamburg the liner was lifted in a floating dock and full repairs were undertaken.

Investigations into the cause of the grounding were undertaken by both the National Transportation Safety Board (USA) and the UK Marine Accident Investigation Branch (MAIB). The actual grounding site on Sow and Pig Reef was located and surveyed. Both investigations came to similar conclusions. There could be no doubt that the cause of the grounding was that the charts for the area were wrong and there was significantly less water than charted. In fact it was discovered that the area was last surveyed on 1939 by dropping a line at regular intervals; this method, of course, can miss significant peaks! It was noted that prior to the grounding QE2 had passed over an area with a 40-foot sounding without mishap or any indication of shallow water effect. QE2 grounded twice in quick succession; at the time of the initial grounding the depth of water was 35.0 feet while the depth of water at the second grounding was 34.2 feet. It assumed that the stationary forward and after draughts of the vessel were 32.3 feet and 31.3 feet respectively. On the assumption that no change in draught was caused by the effect of the prevailing weather conditions, it was apparent that the effect of ‘squat’ on the vessel caused the bow to sink by at least 2.7 feet. ‘Squat’ is a phenomenon where ships travelling at speed in shallow water settle lower in the water than they would normally – but the degree to which they do so is not easy to calculate. The extent of the damage suggested that, on grounding, the vessel was trimmed by the head. The Master had expected squat of one 1 to 1½ feet, with change of trim by the stern. It was clear that Captain Woodall had underestimated the magnitude of ‘squat’ effect upon his vessel in the prevailing circumstances – a factor magnified with the increase of speed to 25 knots.

And what of the rocks? Divers found signs of contact with traces of QE2’s red anti-fouling paint and shavings of steel were found on several rocks which had either been moved boldly horizontally, compressed into the seafloor or partially pulled out of the seabed by almost a foot. It was generally agreed that if a lesser vessel had sustained the damage QE2 had then it would probably have been lost.

In all nine Atlantic crossings and two cruises were cancelled while QE2 was undergoing repairs. There was intense speculation in the press that the repairs, lost revenue and compensation payments would cost Cunard up to £50 million but the company never revealed the actual cost. QE2’s return to Southampton on 3 October was a jubilant occasion with three fireboats escorting her up the Solent and the vessel returned to service the next day.

read more discussion on 1992 Martha's Vineyard Grounding topic
« Last Edit: Dec 31, 2017, 11:11 AM by Lynda Bradford »

Online Michael Gallagher

Re: Hull Patches - what was each one from?
« Reply #16 on: Nov 14, 2017, 07:10 AM »
Collision with Ferry - 1994

QE2 arrived at Circular Quay in Sydney at 1700 hours on 6 February 1994 and engines were finished at 1718 hours with all tugs departing at 1733. At approximately 1745 hours the Sydney ferry Narrabeen made contact with the port side of QE2 while attempting to manoeuvre out from the ferry wharf at Circular Quay. No one on QE2 was aware of the incident and the ferry did not report it. At 1825 hours Sydney Police advised QE2.

QE2 had been damaged in frame no. minus 7 in the vicinity of crew cabin 55. The cabin was empty at the time. An indentation was sustained to QE2’s hull breaking the porthole in cabin 551, and bending the internal framework in the way of the porthole.

Temporary repairs were made with full repairs being completed in the December refit.

The bow of the Narrabeen was damaged.

Online Michael Gallagher

Re: Hull Patches - what was each one from?
« Reply #17 on: Nov 14, 2017, 07:11 AM »
Collision with Tug - 1996

The hull in the hospital area was repaired after suffering damage by tug contact in Trondheim on 22 July 1996.

The hull in the hospital area was repaired during QE2’s 1996 refit in Southampton.


Online Michael Gallagher

Re: Hull Patches - what was each one from?
« Reply #18 on: Nov 14, 2017, 07:11 AM »
Quay Contact - 1996

While QE2 was being pulled out of harbour in Copenhagen on 5 August 1996, strong winds pushed the ship on to the quay when the two tugs were unable to hold her. The lines from the tugs snapped damaging the steering flat. A 50-metre scrape was another result of the damage.

The steering flat was repaired during QE2’s 1996 refit in Southampton.

Online Michael Gallagher

Re: Hull Patches - what was each one from?
« Reply #19 on: Nov 14, 2017, 07:12 AM »
Collision with Whale - 1996

On 15 September 1996 QE2 hit a 60-foot whale which then became lodged on the bulbous bow as the ship entered Lisbon. As the whale was pinned by the tide the rescue workers had to wait for the direction of the current to change before they could tow it away. A crane was then used to remove the whale from the water by which time it was dead.

see discussions in the topic "A whale of a drama"
« Last Edit: Jan 03, 2018, 12:15 PM by Lynda Bradford »

Online Michael Gallagher

Re: Hull Patches - what was each one from?
« Reply #20 on: Nov 14, 2017, 07:12 AM »
Tug Contact - 2000

While manoeuvring within the entrance to Fremantle Harbour at 0650 hours on 21 February 2000 the tug Burra, which was in attendance forward, made heavy contact with her stern on QE2’s starboard side in the Six Deck area. QE2 sustained damage to three frames (249 / 250 and 251) and an indentation to the hull of approximately 75 mm over the area between frames 248 to 252.


Online Michael Gallagher

Re: Hull Patches - what was each one from?
« Reply #21 on: Nov 14, 2017, 07:13 AM »
Japanese Warship - 2000


On 4 July 2000, while docking in New York, one of the tugs assisting QE2 temporarily lost control in a strong ebb tide which resulted in QE2 drifting and making contact with the Japanese warship Koshima which was berthed alongside.

It was an extremely busy time in New York with warships from all over the world taking part in a naval display. Captain Paul Wright had earlier met with the Docking Master of the New York Port Authority and pilots about the docking on 4 July and was assured that the four warships would be docked well back from the corner of the downsteam pier, giving him the corner to rest on if needed when berthing QE2. Captain Wright would not try the berthing otherwise.

Captain Wright delayed his arrival on 4 July by about 30 minutes in order to wait for less current and then began to manoeuvre with tugs in place as instructed. When he started into the entry into Pier 92, it was clear that the warships were much farther out than he had been promised, in fact they were very near the end of the pier. There were two warships rafted abreast on the opposite pier with bows outward making a narrow entry into the slip. However, Captain Wright had no choice but to continue the manoeuvre as to attempt to stop and reverse would have been very dangerous. The aircraft carrier USS Kennedy, with 14 or 15 tugs on her, was behind QE2 waiting to dock after her.

All was going well with QE2 until one of the tugs at the stern got caught in the current and had to pull away to reposition. At that point, the remaining tug could not hold QE2 against the current and her stern swung into the bow of Koshima. The tug had been on the opposite side of the ship from the Captain and Pilot who were on the portside wing.

Koshima was pushed forward into a British warship, Manchester.

Captain Wright and his officers visited the Captains of the warships to apologise but as damage was limited to scratches, lost paintwork and severed lines holding the Koshima the naval officers were not concerned. The US Coast Guard considered the whole incident to be very minor.

An Admiral on Koshima stated:

      “…it was an honour to be kissed by a Queen!”

QE2 delayed her departure slightly to 2030 hours in order to wait for slack water – with the warships still rafted up two abreast, this was seen as a prudent measure.

See also "Kissed by a Queen"
« Last Edit: Jan 03, 2018, 12:20 PM by Lynda Bradford »

Online Michael Gallagher

Re: Hull Patches - what was each one from?
« Reply #22 on: Nov 14, 2017, 07:14 AM »
Tug Contact - 2004

While docking in Tenerife on 17 November 2004 the forward tug started to act erratically and made a sudden turn towards the bow of QE2 resulting in the mast structure coming into contact with the flare of QE2’s bow. The resultant contact caused the tugs mast to bend a few degrees from the vertical and scratched a small section of QE2’s paintwork.

The tug advised QE2 that the starboard engine had failed at a critical time causing the tug to strike QE2’s bow.

Online Michael Gallagher

Re: Hull Patches - what was each one from?
« Reply #23 on: Nov 14, 2017, 07:14 AM »
Whale - 2005

On 17 April 2005 while en route to Madeira from Southampton QE2 came into contact with the body of a decomposing whale. The ship’s speed was reduced and the body fell away.

Captain Nick Bates reported:

   “…while approximately 40miles off the NW coast of Spain we came into contact with the decomposing body of a dead whale. The ships speed was reduced to 6 knots and the carcass fell off the bow. I would estimate the whale to be in the region of 60 feet long, quite a reasonable size. No damage was sustained to the ship and as far as I am aware the incident did not come to the notice of any passengers. We will give the bow a good examination in Funchal just to confirm there is no damage”.


Online Michael Gallagher

Re: Hull Patches - what was each one from?
« Reply #24 on: Nov 14, 2017, 07:15 AM »
Pontoon - 2005

On departure from Geiranger on 15 July 2005 QE2’s wash disturbed and dislodged a small pontoon moored on the shore line. No one was hurt but the pontoon gangway became dislodged and carnage was required to replace the facility to its operational standard.

Online Michael Gallagher

Re: Hull Patches - what was each one from?
« Reply #25 on: Nov 14, 2017, 07:15 AM »
Tug Contact - 2005

On 21 August 2005 during arrival manoeuvres in Bergen the aft tug (Belos) landed heavily on the port quarter of QE2 causing indentation of the hull plating at frames 19 and 20. The QE2 protested and a ‘condition of class’ was imposed.

Online Michael Gallagher

Re: Hull Patches - what was each one from?
« Reply #26 on: Nov 14, 2017, 07:16 AM »
Whale - September 2005

On 15 September while crossing the Atlantic an unidentified object was seen floating nearby to QE2’s course. The ship was slowed as she made a round turn to investigate. The floating object was identified as a dead whale.

Online Michael Gallagher

Re: Hull Patches - what was each one from?
« Reply #27 on: Nov 14, 2017, 07:16 AM »
Scraping the Bottom - 2005

When leaving Cagliari (Sardinia) on Friday 30 September 2005 QE2 touched the bottom close to the breakwater.

Later inspections, as part of her underwater hull survey, discovered extensive scoring to her bottom hull plating on the starboard side; the deepest to 4 mm from frame 132 to 212, between the starboard bilge keel and to within 2.5 mm approx. of the centreline between frames 215 and 130 (approximately). Some bottom plating was also indented approximately 25 to 30 mm Bilge Keel starboard plating set in underside and plate buckled topside.

David Christie (Princess Cruises’ Vice President Marine) advised me in Rio de Janeiro on 27 January 2006 that QE2’s double bottom had been damaged in Cagliari and he expressed relief it hadn’t been one of the Princess ships as if one of them had endured what QE2 had, they would have been “sliced open”.

Online Michael Gallagher

Re: Hull Patches - what was each one from?
« Reply #28 on: Nov 14, 2017, 07:16 AM »
Whale - 2005


While on passage between Lisbon and Barcelona on 20 December 2005 at approximately 2315 hours in the traffic lanes off St Vincent at sea speeds of 26.5 knots QE2 struck a whale.

It was a stormy night with moderate rain and the animal was not seen from the Bridge. The first indication officers had of the incident was a reduction in speed and an increase in the load on the engines. The Third Officer was sent forward and initially could not see anything due to the wind and spray. The ship was slowed to 14 knots; the Third Officer then reported seeing a whale impaled on the stem. Speed was reduced further to four knots at which point the apparently dead whale slid clear of the bow and sunk.

Headway was regained at 2355 hours and QE2 resumed passage at 2400 hours.

Online Michael Gallagher

Re: Hull Patches - what was each one from?
« Reply #29 on: Nov 14, 2017, 07:17 AM »
Tug Contact - 2006


While departing Curacao on Saturday 14 January 2006 the tug ‘Jaro II’, while pushing on the starboard shoulder hit and damaged QE2’s hull in way of frame 230. QE2’s departure was delayed while an examination too place. Cabin 5025 was damaged which necessitated re-building.

Lloyd’s visited the ship on 23 January for further inspections but very little action was recommended.